The editorial team of the Tayacaja Scientific Research Journal tends to include both national and international evaluators in its Scientific Committee team, experts on the subject they are asked to rule on. The evaluator in question undertakes to submit his concept within the period stipulated by said team.
Likewise, the evaluator will be sent the article, without the name of the author (following the policies of double-blind arbitration), and the format in which they must record their academic concept, committing to comply with and ensure the Editorial Policies: said concept must be clear, concise, impartial and non-offensive. The evaluating peers will be made aware that plagiarism or improper use of the evaluated texts is an action with legal consequences.
The criteria that are taken into account and that are recorded in the evaluation format are the following:
• Quality of the article: clarity, relevance of the methodology used (conceptual and methodological rigor), optimal use of the different parts in which the article is distributed (abstract, introduction, problem statement, development, conclusions, references), process of Solid research, consistency.
• Contribution to knowledge: relevance in the area of knowledge, feedback in the epistemic field, relevance.
• Contributions of authorship: clear, critical and differentiated contributions from other texts, news in the area of knowledge.
• Bibliographic management: guarantee against plagiarism, current bibliography, relevance in research sources.
• Additional tips.
Descargas: