Evaluation of the efficiency of an integrated biofilm and phytoremediation system with Nasturtium officinale for the treatment of municipal wastewater in Huancavelica
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

aguas residuales
sistema integrado
biofilm
fitorremediación wastewater
integrated system
biofilm
phytoremediation

How to Cite

Álvarez Ticllasuca, A., Curasma Matamoros, M., Sandoval Condori, E., & Toribio Román, F. (2021). Evaluation of the efficiency of an integrated biofilm and phytoremediation system with Nasturtium officinale for the treatment of municipal wastewater in Huancavelica . Tayacaja, 4(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.46908/tayacaja.v4i2.168

Abstract

In this research removal efficiency was evaluated of organic pollutants of a biofilm and phytoremediation integrated system for municipal wastewater treatment in Huancavelica. A pilot plant consisting of a settler was installed that also retained oils and fats, a biological filter using as support material the calcareous stuff and a phytoremediation process with Nasturtium officinale (watercress) The hydraulic retention time was 5.5 hours and the flowrate of 0.011 L s -1, the evaluation was made of the proper functioning of processes by monitoring control parameters. The pollutant removal efficiency was determined by Student's "t" test (p <0.05). An average pH value of 7.57 and a temperature of 12.07 ° C were obtained, subsequently the measurement of BOD5 was initiated, obtaining maximum effluent values of 131 ppm and minimum values of 45 ppm and a removal efficiency of 44.8% was obtained, for COD. In total coliforms, fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli the removal was 66.67%, 94.59%, 81.22% and 72.12% respectively, oil and fat analysis was also performed and total suspended solids, however high removal efficiency was not obtained. It is concluded that the parameters of BOD5 and COD comply with the MPL for the effluents of municipal domestic wastewater treatment plants, while the rest of the parameters analyzed do not comply with the regulations. however high removal efficiency was not obtained. It is concluded that the parameters of BOD5 and COD comply with the MPL for the effluents of municipal domestic wastewater treatment plants, while the rest of the parameters analyzed do not comply with the regulations. however high removal efficiency was not obtained. It is concluded that the parameters of BOD5 and COD comply with the MPL for the effluents of municipal domestic wastewater treatment plants, while the rest of the parameters analyzed do not comply with the regulations.

https://doi.org/10.46908/tayacaja.v4i2.168
PDF (Español (España))

References

Cervantes, A. (2009). Combined system for the treatment of wastewater for single-family homes. National Autonomous University of Mexico [Undergraduate Thesis].

Charris, J., & Caselles, A. (2016). Efficiency of pollutant removal from domestic wastewater with experimental constructed wetlands planted with Cyperusligularis (Cyperaceae) and Echinochloacolonum (Poaceae). Water Technologies and Sciences, 7 (6), 93–103.

Chernicharo, C. (2013). Principles of the Biological Treatment of Wastewater Anaerobic Reactors |. (University of Nariño, Ed.). Colombia.

Delgadillo, O., Camacho, A., Perez, L., & Andrade, M. (2010). Wastewater purification through artificial wetlands (Nelson Antequera). Cochabamba, Bolivia.

Espinoza, A. (2017). Reduction of the BOD, COD and STD of the domestic wastewater of Santiago de Chuco using a pumice stone biofilter. César Vallejo University [Undergraduate Thesis].

Hammond, D. (2010). Thescience of synthesis: exploring the social implications of general systemstheory. University Press of Colorado.

Hernández, J. (2010). Alternatives for the treatment of gray wastewater of domestic origin. University of San Carlos of Guatemala.

ECOPROJET SAC Laboratory (2016). Test report: 35225/2016. Huancavelica.

Monzón, JIT, García, ALE, Florio, L. de, Montero, RD, Cortazar, ALG de, & Hernández, MLR (2012). Innovative biofilm technologies for wastewater treatment: twenty-five years of research by the Environmental Engineering Group of the University of Cantabria. Civil Engineering, 168, 61–74.

Núñez, RA, Meas, Y., Ortega, R., & Olguín, E. (2004). Phytoremediation: fundamentals and applications, 15.

Quispe, A. (2018). Efficiency evaluation between two biofilter systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater in the town of Carapongo, Lurigancho Chosica. Federico Villarreal National University [Undergraduate Thesis].

Rodríguez, JP, Gómez, E., Garavito, L., & López, F. (2010). Comparison study of domestic wastewater treatment using lentils and water buchon in artificial wetlands. Water Technology and Sciences, (1), 59–68.

Rodríguez Miranda, Juan P., García-Ubaque, César A., & García-Ubaque, Juan C .. (2016). Diseases transmitted by water and basic sanitation in Colombia. Journal of Public Health, 18 (5), 738-745.

Sanhueza, C., Palma, J., Valenzuela, P., Araneda, O., & Calderón, K. (2011). Evaluation of the geotechnical behavior of Chilean volcanic soils for use as filter material in the treatment of domestic wastewater. Revista de La Construcción, 10 (2), 66–81.

Siguí, L. (2013). Design and construction of an intermittent gravel filter without recirculation and comparison with theoretical efficiencies of filters with recirculation for the treatment of domestic wastewater. University of San Carlos de Guatemala [Undergraduate Thesis].

Ugaz, F. (2018). Reuse of wastewater, biologically treated for the irrigation of the botanical garden, Trujillo, La Libertad - Peru. National University of Trujillo [Undergraduate Thesis].

Vasquez, S. (2017). Efficiency analysis of a Biofilter prototype in the treatment of wastewater for irrigation in Trapiche, Comas, 2017. Universidad César Vallejo [Undergraduate Thesis].

Vicente, J. (2016). Determination of the efficiency of sawdust and coconut fiber used as packaging for the removal of pollutants in Biofilters for wastewater treatment. UTE Approach, 7 (3), 41.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Adiel Álvarez Ticllasuca, Marco Curasma Matamoros, Estefani Sandoval Condori, Fernando Toribio Román

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.